Economics
Without The B.S.**: An Appraisal of the Bailout – Part II
[** Double entendre intended.]
An
Appraisal of the Bailout – Part II
If you want to get an idea of just how
serious the Financial Crisis of 2008 was and what it cost us I know of no
better source than the Federal Reserve’s Report of December 1, 2010.
News
reports which summarize the Fed Report:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703865004575649160241029520
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704594804575648683678596728.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704594804575648683678596728.
If you are as old as me you can recall
experts saying that the Fed is limited in actions in what it can do in the
economy – mainly setting short-term interest rates by utilizing the Fed window
for bank borrowing and setting bank reserve requirements (e.g., the discount
rate and Fed funds rate, etc.). Stanley
Fischer, who was nominated by President Obama to be the next Vice Chair of the
Federal Reserve with Janet Yellen and was one of Ben Bernanke’s instructors,
has a text book on Macro-Economics which he co-authored and released a revised
edition in 2007 before the outbreak of the Financial Crisis in 2008. It is a text book that is a standard at many
universities and details the role of central banking in rescuing the financial
industry during times of crisis. He and
his co-authors had to release a newly revised edition just a couple of months
ago as a result of his student’s extraordinary actions in 2008 and 2009. Fischer himself ran the Central Bank of
Israel recently for over ten years and previously served with the IMF and World
Bank.
So let’s take a look at what actions
the Fed took. 21,000 transactions in all
from December 2007 to July 2010. $9
Trillion – that is not a typo; TRILLION
with a ‘T’ – in all with not just leaving the Fed discount window wide open but
a whole host of other measures never contemplated by previous chairmen. There were days when over $1 Trillion was
being loaned out, with the biggest day being December 5th, 2008 for
a total of $1.2 Trillion.
The Fed used a variety of emergency
actions for the bailout. There were over
$9 Trillion in emergency short-term loans, mainly using the Fed discount
window. Goldman-Sachs and Morgan Stanley
were converted to bank holding companies so they could tap the Fed discount
window. And my links show, tap it they
did quite liberally. As the Bloomberg
link points out, these loans are like no interest loans to these largest of
financial institutions so they earn the interest rate on the Government
treasuries that are purchased with the loan – earning $13 Billion on the
trillions of dollars of short-term loans.
Loans provided by the Term Auction and Primary Dealer Credit facilities
alone totaled nearly $13 Trillion.
In addition to banks getting bailed
out by the Fed, were investors – Fidelity, Black Rock, Merrill Lynch, T. Rowe
Price, Oppenheimer, PIMCO, and CalPERS among others. Non-bank companies got Fed bailouts – GE,
Harley-Davidson, Caterpillar, McDonald’s, Verizon, as well as pension funds and
insurers. Although it is legal for our
Fed to have exchanges with foreign central banks, it is not legal for our Fed
to bailout foreign companies. But that
didn’t stop our Fed. The December 1, 2010 report shows that our Fed lent to the central banks of Britain, Japan,
Sweden, South Korea, Australia, Denmark, Mexico, Norway, Switzerland, and the European Central Bank,
in some cases so the foreign central bank could make the loan available to
companies within their country.
All of these constitute the bailout by
our Fed, monetary policy by the Central Bank.
None of this includes fiscal policy by our Federal Government. Under Bush we had a $700 Billion TARP-I. Under Obama we had TARP-II for another $700
Billion. In addition to Fed actions, we
had the FDIC guaranteeing bank debt during the take-over/restructuring of banks
that failed (over 100 I believe) and the AIG bailout/rescue along with GM and
Chrysler. ProPublica has a bailout tracker at https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/list.
And talking about fiscal policy, and remembering from a previous post on the blog that the object in a financial crisis is not to constrict economic activity but to flood the market with liquidity, many of our state and local governments were doing just the reverse and were cutting spending and payrolls and trying to keep their budgets balanced while the Federal Government deficit grew from $400+ Billion to $1.1 Trillion just under Bush before he left office in January 20th, 2009, four months after Lehman Brothers failed setting off the Financial Crisis.
And talking about fiscal policy, and remembering from a previous post on the blog that the object in a financial crisis is not to constrict economic activity but to flood the market with liquidity, many of our state and local governments were doing just the reverse and were cutting spending and payrolls and trying to keep their budgets balanced while the Federal Government deficit grew from $400+ Billion to $1.1 Trillion just under Bush before he left office in January 20th, 2009, four months after Lehman Brothers failed setting off the Financial Crisis.
So to put some kind of perspective on
the extent of the Crisis and what it took to fix it, remember right now we have
some opposed to extending Unemployment Benefits to the long-term unemployed
because of the costs – something just over $200 Billion since it was initiated
in 2007, SNAP cuts of about $17 Billion over 10 years, food stamp cuts of $8
Billion over 10 years, and cuts to Vets of about $6 Billion over 10 years. And I don’t even want to mention what it
would take to fix Social Security or MediCare for comparison sake.
Neither do I want to get into
compensation on Wall Street or in the financial sector, the bonuses that went
out in 2009, especially for the extraordinary skills displayed in “managing” a
company through “The Crisis”. I will
mention that when J.P. Morgan, the person not the bank, rescued a company in
the 19th Century he fired the president of the bank and replaced the
Board of Directors, all without compensation (or green mail).
So like I mentioned in a previous
post, if you are a small business in Topeka, Kansas and you cannot get a loan
today that you could have secured a few years ago…Tada, Tada, Tada!
No comments:
Post a Comment